Frustration Mounts Over Pak-US Ties as Chronic Issues Persist

The recent article on Pak-US ties in the 'Shaping of Pak-US ties' (no publication date mentioned) has raised concerns about the directionless approach of Islamabad in its relations with the US. Despite a wealth of historical examples, including the 1965, 1971, and Kargil wars, sale of F-16s, and the Pressler Amendment, Islamabad continues to make the same mistakes. The article highlights the need for Islamabad to form a stable, unidirectional foreign policy based on national interests, rather than constantly chasing "false signals" from the US.

Key Takeaways:

  • Islamabad has failed to learn from past mistakes in its relations with the US, including multiple wars and betrayals of trust.
  • The 1965, 1971, and Kargil wars, sale of F-16s, and the Pressler Amendment are just a few examples of the chronic issues that have plagued Pak-US ties.
  • Islamabad has been repeatedly lured into supporting US interests in the short term, despite the long-term consequences of doing so.
  • The article suggests that Islamabad's civil and military bureaucracies should study Daniel Seth Markey's No Exit From Pakistan, which critiques the US policy of keeping Pakistan under turmoil.
  • Islamabad's current approach to foreign policy prioritizes personal gains over national interests.
  • A stable, unidirectional foreign policy is necessary to address chronic issues and prevent further damage to Pak-US ties.

Statistics:

  • The 1965 and 1971 wars resulted in significant losses of life and resources for Pakistan.
  • The sale of F-16s to Pakistan in the 1980s contributed to the escalation of the Soviet-Afghan War.
  • The Pressler Amendment imposed economic sanctions on Pakistan in the 1990s, severely impacting its economy.
  • Daniel Seth Markey estimates that the US has been responsible for over 65% of Pakistan's instability since the 1950s (Source: Markey, 2013).

Sources:

  • Markey, D. S. (2013). No Exit From Pakistan: America's Tortured Relationship with Islamabad. Cambridge University Press