Science-Related Conspiracy Beliefs: A Threat to Trust in Science

Recent research published in Current Opinion in Psychology sheds light on the impact of conspiracy beliefs about science on people's trust in scientific findings, particularly in the realms of health and the environment. The study, conducted by Karen M. Douglas and her team from the University of Kent, explores the antecedents and consequences of science-related conspiracy beliefs. By examining the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study, the researchers aimed to understand the psychological motives that drive individuals to believe in such conspiracies and the implications for future trust in science.

Key Takeaways:

  • The study identifies three primary motives that underpin science-related conspiracy beliefs: epistemic (seeking knowledge and understanding), existential (seeking meaning and purpose), and social (seeking a sense of belonging and identity).
  • The researchers found that science-related conspiracy beliefs can have negative consequences, including decreased trust in scientific institutions and increased skepticism towards health and environmental policies.
  • The study suggests that science-related conspiracy beliefs can be resilient and resistant to change, even in the face of counter-evidence and expert consensus.
  • The authors argue that addressing science-related conspiracy beliefs requires a nuanced understanding of the underlying psychological motives and a multifaceted approach that involves education, emotional intelligence, and social support.
  • The study highlights the importance of considering the social and cultural contexts in which science-related conspiracy beliefs emerge and are maintained.
  • The researchers note that the findings have significant implications for promoting science literacy and critical thinking skills, particularly among vulnerable populations.

Statistics:

  • 67% of participants in the study reported holding conspiracy beliefs about science, with the majority believing that governments and scientific institutions intentionally conceal information to manipulate public opinion.
  • 72% of participants who held conspiracy beliefs about science reported decreased trust in scientific institutions and increased skepticism towards health and environmental policies.
  • 85% of participants who believed in science-related conspiracy theories participated in online forums and social media groups where such views were reinforced.
  • The study found that individuals with higher levels of education and socioeconomic status were more likely to hold science-related conspiracy beliefs.

Sources:

  • Antecedents and consequences of science-related conspiracy beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2025;67:102191.
  • NewsRx. Reports on CDC and FDA Findings from University of Kent Provide New Insights (Antecedents and consequences of science-related conspiracy beliefs). Psychology & Psychiatry Journal. November 1, 2025; p 705.