Bipartisan Coalition Fights to Preserve Fairness in Women's Sports

A bipartisan coalition of US Senators and Representatives led by Senator Jim Risch (R-Idaho) and Representative Riley Moore (R-W.Va.) has filed an amicus brief with the US Supreme Court in support of Idaho and West Virginia's laws that prohibit biological men from participating in women's sports. The coalition argues that Title IX was written on the basis of sex, not gender identity, and that any attempts to expand upon Title IX protections must come from Congress, not the courts.

Key Takeaways:

  • The amicus brief emphasizes that Title IX was written on the basis of sex, not gender identity, and that any attempts to expand upon Title IX protections must come from Congress, not the courts.
  • Senators Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Jim Justice (R-W.Va.), and Jim Banks (R-Ind.), and Representatives Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), Russ Fulcher (R-Idaho), and Carol Miller (R-W.Va.) joined in filing the brief.
  • The coalition argues that allowing biological males to compete in women's sports undermines the fairness and protections Title IX was designed to provide.
  • Senator Jim Risch has been a leader in preserving fairness in women's sports and Title IX, introducing the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act and Fair Play for Girls Act.
  • Idaho was the first state to pass a law banning biological males from competing in female athletics, and the coalition argues that this is a common-sense standard that should be met across the country.
  • The amicus brief highlights the importance of protecting the integrity of women's sports and ensuring that female athletes have a level playing field.

Statistics:

  • Over 50 years have passed since Congress passed Title IX, which established protections for women in all levels of education against discrimination on the basis of sex.
  • Since then, Idaho has become the first state to ban biological males who identify as female from competing against women and girls in sports.
  • The amicus brief emphasizes that Title IX was enacted under the Spending Clause, which requires clear and unambiguous provisions, none of which say anything about gender identity.

Sources:

  • Senator Jim Risch's official website
  • Representative Riley Moore's official website
  • US Senate press release (September 19)
  • Original text available at https://www.risch.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/pressreleases?ID=5ABF6F57-401F-4822-9963-D057E00937AC