Cybercrime Sentencing: Nine Scammers Awarded Life Imprisonment for Economic Terrorism in Bengal's Nadia District

A landmark judgment in the country's fight against cybercrime was delivered in a trial court in Kalyani, Nadia district, Bengal, where nine scammers who extorted Rs 1 crore from a Ranaghat resident by threatening with "digital arrest" were sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution had charged that such crimes were a form of "economic terrorism," and the court agreed. The convicts, who were arrested from Maharashtra, Haryana, and Gujarat, were part of a larger gang that allegedly amassed Rs 100 crore by cheating 108 people across India. They are also set to face trials elsewhere in the country. The defense has indicated they will appeal the conviction in the Calcutta high court.

Key Takeaways:

  • Nine scammers were sentenced to life imprisonment for extorting Rs 1 crore from a Ranaghat resident by threatening with "digital arrest" in a trial court in Kalyani, Nadia district, Bengal.
  • The scammers were part of a larger gang that allegedly amassed Rs 100 crore by cheating 108 people across India.
  • The prosecution charged that such crimes were a form of "economic terrorism," which the court agreed with.
  • The convicts were arrested from Maharashtra, Haryana, and Gujarat, and are also set to face trials elsewhere in the country.
  • The defense has indicated they will appeal the conviction in the Calcutta high court.
  • The trial involved 29 witnesses from four different states, including the SHO of Andheri (West) police station and branch managers of several banks.
  • The chargesheet ran into 2,600 pages, indicating the complexity of the case.

Statistics:

  • Rs 1 crore extorted from a Ranaghat resident by threatening with "digital arrest"
  • Rs 100 crore allegedly amassed by the scam gang through cheating 108 people across India
  • 9 scammers sentenced to life imprisonment
  • 29 witnesses testified physically before the court
  • 2,600 pages in the chargesheet
  • 4 states involved in the case: Maharashtra, Haryana, Gujarat, and Bengal (Nadia district)

Sources:

  • Dwaipayan Ghosh, reports dated unspecified (no date mentioned)