Electric Cars Hold Greater Promise for Reducing Emissions and Oil Imports
A new research study published by the Baker Institute for Public Policy at Rice University has found that electric cars hold a greater promise for reducing emissions and lowering US oil imports than a national renewable portfolio standard. According to the study, mandating that 30% of all vehicles be electric by 2050 would reduce US oil use by 2.5 million barrels a day and cut emissions by 7%, compared to 4% reduction in emissions through national renewable portfolio standard.
Key Takeaways:
- Mandating 30% of all vehicles be electric by 2050 would reduce US oil use by 2.5 million barrels a day, according to the study.
- Electric vehicles could cut emissions by 7% in the US, compared to 4% reduction through national renewable portfolio standard.
- Business-as-usual market-related trends might propel the US toward greater oil and natural gas self-sufficiency over the next 20 years.
- Implementing carbon caps and pricing or a high carbon tax could lead to a significant increase in US reliance on oil imports between 2019 and 2025.
- US reliance on imports of foreign liquefied natural gas (LNG) would increase by 2025 due to carbon pricing or high carbon tax.
- Under a business-as-usual approach, the US won't have to import any LNG for decades.
- The growth of natural gas will help the environment by lowering the demand for coal.
Statistics:
- 2.5 million barrels a day: Reduction in US oil use by 2050 if 30% of all vehicles are electric.
- 30%: Mandated electric vehicle penetration by 2050 for maximum emissions reduction.
- 7%: Emissions reduction in the US through electric vehicle adoption.
- 4%: Emissions reduction in the US through national renewable portfolio standard.
- 20 years: Period over which US oil and natural gas self-sufficiency is expected to increase under business-as-usual market-related trends.
- 2025: Year by which US reliance on imports of foreign liquefied natural gas (LNG) would increase due to carbon pricing or high carbon tax.
Sources:
- Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy