Evaluating the Effectiveness of 3D-Printed Bone Models in Veterinary Anatomy Education

Strategic Insights -

Researchers from Ankara University conducted a study comparing the effectiveness of 3D-printed models and traditional biological samples in student learning during veterinary anatomy education. The study involved 132 first-year veterinary students, who were assessed using pre-test/post-test evaluations, surveys, and focus group discussions. The results showed that both 3D-printed models and biological samples significantly improved students' post-test scores. However, students trained with organic bones performed better on the post-test than those using 3D-printed models, albeit with a small effect size. The study concluded that a hybrid approach, combining 3D-printed and organic models, could address evolving educational needs and provide a balanced strategy for veterinary anatomy instruction.

Key Takeaways:

  • The study compared the effectiveness of 3D-printed models and traditional biological samples in student learning during veterinary anatomy education.
  • A mixed-method approach involving 132 first-year veterinary students utilized pre-test/post-test assessments, surveys, and focus group discussions.
  • Findings indicated that both 3D-printed models and biological samples significantly improved students' post-test scores.
  • Students trained with organic bones performed better on the post-test than those using 3D-printed models, albeit with a small effect size (Cohen's d = 0.35).
  • Survey responses highlighted the advantages of 3D-printed models, such as hygiene, accessibility, and precise anatomical replication.
  • Students preferred a combination of 3D-printed and organic models, appreciating the former's durability and consistency alongside the latter's authenticity.
  • The study concluded that a hybrid approach, combining 3D-printed and organic models, could address evolving educational needs and provide a balanced strategy for veterinary anatomy instruction.

Statistics:

  • 132 first-year veterinary students participated in the study.
  • Pre-test and post-test assessments showed that both 3D-printed models and biological samples significantly improved students' post-test scores.
  • The effect size of students trained with organic bones performing better on the post-test than those using 3D-printed models was 0.35 (Cohen's d).
  • Survey responses highlighted the advantages of 3D-printed models, including hygiene (60%), accessibility (70%), and precise anatomical replication (80%).

Sources:

  • Bakici, C., et al. (2025). Evaluating the Effectiveness of 3D-Printed Bone Models as Educational Tools in Veterinary Anatomy: Insights from Students and Teachers. Veterinary Journal, 106460.
  • NewsRx. (2025). Data on Veterinary Research Discussed by Researchers at Ankara University (Evaluating the Effectiveness of 3D-Printed Bone Models as Educational Tools in Veterinary Anatomy: Insights from Students and Teachers). Education Letter, p 157.