FERC Urged to Act on Refunds Due to Con Edison, Linden VFT, LLC, Hudson Transmission Partners, LLC, and New York Power Authority
The Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Linden VFT, LLC, Hudson Transmission Partners, LLC, and the New York Power Authority have jointly filed a motion with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to enforce a holding from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in their favor. The decision, reached nearly three years ago, found that the 1% de minimis threshold as applied to the New York entities was "unlawful" and that the Commission had not provided a reasonable explanation for applying a cost allocation methodology suited for "flow-based" projects to non-flow-based projects. The New York entities estimate they are owed over $175 million in refunds, inclusive of interest, which continues to accrue as the Commission remains inactive.
Key Takeaways:
- The Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Linden VFT, LLC, Hudson Transmission Partners, LLC, and the New York Power Authority (New York Entities) have jointly filed a motion with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to enforce a holding from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
- The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals found that the 1% de minimis threshold as applied to the New York entities was "unlawful" in the Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. FERC decision (RTEP Decision).
- The New York entities estimate they are owed over $175 million in refunds, inclusive of interest, which continues to accrue as the Commission remains inactive.
- A separate complaint proceeding involving the Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) and Neptune Regional Transmission System, LLC (Neptune) has been resolved via a settlement, removing an obstacle to the Commission's consideration of the motion.
- The motion was last updated on June 9, 2025.
- The New York entities have been requesting the Commission to act on remand from the RTEP Decision for nearly three years.
Statistics:
- The estimated total amount owed to the New York entities: over $175 million, inclusive of interest.
- The time the Commission has remained inactive on remand: nearly three years.
- The 1% de minimis threshold found to be "unlawful" in the RTEP Decision.
- The number of agreements supporting the proposed settlement in the LIPA and Neptune proceeding: most of the PJM transmission owners.
Sources:
- Docket No. EL15-18-000 PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Consolidated Edison Company ) of New York, Inc. v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
- Docket No. EL15-67-000 PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Linden VFT, LLC v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
- Docket No. EL17-68-000 PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Linden VFT, LLC v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
- Docket Nos. ER17-725-000 ER17-725-001 ER17-725-002 ER17-725-003 PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
- ER17-950-000 ER17-950-001 ER17-950-002 ER17-950-003 PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
- Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. FERC, 45 F.4th 265 (D.C. Cir. 2022).
- Federal Power Act.
- 18 C.F.R. § 385.212.