Microsoft Antitrust Suit: Final Arguments Begin Amid Looming Settlement Talks

Federal judge Thomas Penfield Jackson has refused to delay final courtroom arguments in the antitrust suit against Microsoft Corp., citing poor progress in settlement talks with the company. Despite Judge Richard Posner's involvement in mediating secret negotiations in Chicago, Jackson believes no additional time is needed to reach a resolution. The case, which could result in significant consequences for Microsoft, is expected to conclude within weeks.

Key Takeaways:

• The US District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson has decided to proceed with final courtroom arguments in the antitrust suit against Microsoft Corp., despite ongoing settlement talks.
• The judge believes settlement talks are lagging, with little progress reported from the secret negotiations in Chicago mediated by Judge Richard Posner.
• A decision in favor of the government could lead to another proceeding to determine what actions to take against Microsoft.
• If found guilty, Microsoft may face significant consequences, including appeals that could remain in the courts for years.
• Microsoft chairman Bill Gates was involved in a dispute last week over reports of a possible concession to settle the case, including opening the blueprints to Windows programs.
• The final arguments are set to begin despite a previous decision by Judge Jackson to consider delaying the trial if more time were needed.
• The Chicago negotiations aim to avert a lengthy appeals battle and have been urged by Judge Jackson to reach a settlement.

Statistics:

• 2000 FEB 22: The date set for the start of final courtroom arguments in the antitrust suit against Microsoft Corp.
• Weeks: The expected timeframe for the case to conclude within weeks of the final arguments.
• Years: The potential duration of a lengthy appeals battle if Microsoft is found guilty.

Sources:

• Associated Press (AP)
• Newsbytes.com
• Reuters Online
• PC, LEGAL, BUSINESS/MSLAW/PHOTO (20000222/WIRES ONLINE)