Norwich Union's Resilience Amidst Economic Turmoil

Norwich Union, a leading insurance and investment group, has demonstrated remarkable resilience in the face of economic challenges, with pre-tax profits reaching £460 million for the 26 weeks to June 30. Despite the Easter floods costing £13 million, the company's major business of pensions and life insurance saw significant growth, driven by increasing interest in savings and private pensions. Norwich Union's group chief executive, Richard Harvey, attributed this growth to the company's strategic decision to avoid investing in troubled economies, thereby shielding itself from the global economic turmoil.

Key Takeaways:

  • Norwich Union's pre-tax profits for the 26 weeks to June 30 stood at £460 million, a significant increase from £335 million for the equivalent period last year.
  • The company's major business of pensions and life insurance saw substantial growth, driven by growing interest in savings and private pensions.
  • Norwich Union's decision to avoid investing in troubled economies, such as Russia and the Far East, has insulated the group from the global economic turmoil.
  • The company's focus on savings and private pensions has enabled it to capitalize on the low inflation economy.
  • Despite the potential risks, Norwich Union's profits are expected to remain robust, with a 10% drop in the London stock market impacting profits by around £75 million.

Statistics:

  • Norwich Union's pre-tax profits for the 26 weeks to June 30: £460 million
  • Comparative pre-tax profits for the equivalent period last year: £335 million
  • Growth in Norwich Union's pension and life insurance business: significant growth driven by increasing interest in savings and private pensions
  • Total funds under management: £53.7 billion (up from £49.2 billion last year)
  • Potential impact of a 10% drop in the London stock market on Norwich Union's profits: £75 million

Sources:

  • Variations of a theme; no title (newspaper article, author unknown)
  • The article's date is not explicitly mentioned, but it can be inferred that the article was published after June 30, when the 26-week period ended.