Trial of Soldier F: Decisive Evidence Challenges Defense's Claims

The trial of Soldier F, a former British paratrooper accused of murdering two men during the Bloody Sunday incident in 1972, has taken a crucial turn as the prosecution presents "decisive evidence" to build its case. The evidence in question consists of statements made by two other soldiers, Soldiers G and H, who claim that their colleague fired shots at Glenfada Park North on January 30, 1972. The statements were made to the Royal Military Police on the night of the shootings, as well as to the Widgery Inquiry later in 1972, and a transcript of oral evidence given to that inquiry.

Key Takeaways:

  • The prosecution, led by Louis Mably KC, presented statements made by Soldiers G and H as "decisive evidence" to support the claim that Soldier F fired shots at Glenfada Park North on January 30, 1972.
  • The statements were made to the Royal Military Police on the night of the shootings, as well as to the Widgery Inquiry later in 1972, and a transcript of oral evidence given to that inquiry.
  • The defense's argument is that the statements are truthful in identifying which soldiers fired shots but are untruthful in other respects.
  • Soldier H's solicitor has indicated that their client will exercise their privilege against self-incrimination if compelled to attend court.
  • The defense is set to respond to the prosecution's evidence today.

Statistics:

  • 13 civilians were shot dead by members of the Parachute Regiment on January 30, 1972, in Derry.
  • James Wray and William McKinney were two of the civilians killed during the incident.
  • Soldier F denies murdering James Wray and William McKinney, as well as attempting to murder four other civilians.
  • The statements made by Soldiers G and H were made to the Royal Military Police on the night of the shootings (January 30, 1972) and to the Widgery Inquiry later in 1972.

Sources:

  • "Court: Soldier F trial: Prosecution outlines Soldier G's testimony". (The Irish Times, 2023)

Note: The date of the article from The Irish Times is not provided, but based on the context, it is assumed to be from 2023.