Trump's Nominee for US Ambassador to the United Nations Faces Scrutiny Over Security Blunder
President Donald Trump's nominee for US ambassador to the United Nations, Mike Waltz, is set to face questioning from lawmakers on Tuesday, following revelations that he mistakenly added a journalist to a private Signal chat discussing sensitive military plans. This marks his first public appearance since his removal as national security adviser in May. Senators will have their initial opportunity to scrutinize Mr. Waltz over reports that he included The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, in a private text chain on an unclassified messaging app, which was used to plan strikes against Houthi militants in Yemen.
Waltz took responsibility for the security breach, but criticism mounted against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who shared the same sensitive plans in another Signal chat that included family. Hegseth, however, has Trump's support. Waltz was removed as national security adviser in May and nominated for the U.N. role, with Trump praising him for putting the nation's interests first.
If confirmed, Waltz would be coming to the U.N. at a moment of great change. The world body is reeling from Trump's decision to slash foreign assistance, affecting its humanitarian aid agencies, and anticipates U.S. funding cuts to the U.N. annual budget. The United Nations is facing major changes under the "America First" foreign policy realignment, with the White House asserting that some of the U.N.'s agencies and bodies have drifted from their founding mission.
Key Takeaways:
- Mike Waltz, President Donald Trump's nominee for US ambassador to the United Nations, faces scrutiny over a security blunder in which he mistakenly added a journalist to a private Signal chat discussing sensitive military plans.
- Waltz took responsibility for the security breach and was removed as national security adviser in May after criticism mounted against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who shared similar sensitive plans in another Signal chat that included family.
- If confirmed, Waltz would be coming to the U.N. at a moment of great change, with the world body reeling from Trump's decision to slash foreign assistance and anticipate U.S. funding cuts to the U.N. annual budget.
- The United Nations is facing major changes under the "America First" foreign policy realignment, with the White House asserting that some of the U.N.'s agencies and bodies have drifted from their founding mission.
- Senator Tammy Duckworth, a Democratic committee member, met with Waltz to discuss issues including whether the Trump administration would use the U.N. to strengthen alliances and combat Chinese influence.
- Even with Democratic opposition, Waltz is expected to be confirmed, with Senator Markwayne Mullin saying he will "be fine" and Senator Duckworth stating that she and Waltz discussed a wide range of issues, including "Signalgate."
Statistics:
- The United States is the largest donor to the United Nations, accounting for approximately 22% of the U.N. annual budget.
- The White House has asserted that some of the U.N.'s agencies and bodies have drifted from their founding mission and "act contrary to the interests of the United States while attacking our allies and propagating anti-Semitism."
- Trump's decision to slash foreign assistance has affected the U.N.'s humanitarian aid agencies, with cuts anticipated in the U.N. annual budget.
- Mike Waltz, the U.N. nominee, earns an annual salary of $195,200 on the White House payroll.
Sources:
- The Associated Press, citing John Bolton's recent statement that the U.N. is "probably in the worst shape it's been in since it was founded"
- The White House, listing Waltz's annual salary on its payroll as of July 1
- The Atlantic, citing reports that Waltz included The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, in a private text chain on an unclassified messaging app
- Senator Tammy Duckworth, discussing her meeting with Waltz on Monday
- Senator Markwayne Mullin, stating that Waltz will "be fine" and praising his ability to withstand criticism.