Tariff Truce: US-China Deal Pares Back U.S. Tariffs, Raises Diversification Concerns

The recent US-China trade deal has lowered U.S. tariffs on certain Chinese products to levels near or below those imposed on products from other countries, providing relief to companies with operations in China. However, this development has raised concerns among economists and executives that it may slow the move by companies to find alternatives to China, potentially complicating a longer-run effort by U.S. officials to reduce America's dependence on Chinese supply chains.

Key Takeaways:

• The US-China trade deal has lowered U.S. tariffs on Chinese products to 10%, which is lower than the 20% tariff on certain other countries, including India and Brazil.
• The average effective tariff on Chinese goods has risen by 20.2 percentage points this year, compared with 17.3 percentage points for the rest of the world.
• Companies that rely on doing business with China have been grateful for the tariff reduction, but some economists and executives argue that it may slow the move by companies to find alternatives to China.
• The deal may also chip away at the economic advantage that companies had expected from moving factories to countries like Brazil, Vietnam, and India.
• The Trump administration is disputing the idea that the tariff deal is not encouraging relocation out of China, arguing that its national security tariffs will disproportionately affect China.
• The trade deal has provided some relief for small companies that depend on Chinese factories for highly technical work, but many smaller companies have not had the resources to diversify their supply chains.

Statistics:

• U.S. tariffs on Chinese products have been lowered to 10%, but other tariffs, such as the 7.5 to 25% tariff left over from the first-term trade war, still apply to a portion of Chinese imports.
• American tariffs on certain products from other countries, such as the 34% tariff on India and the 50% tariff on Brazil, may make little sense, according to economists.
• The administration has imposed tariffs of 10% on imports from countries like Canada and Australia, but runs trade surpluses with both countries.
• China's ability to retaliate against U.S. tariffs is one reason that the country is not facing more severe tariffs.

Sources:

• (no date)
• The New York Times, (2023)
• The Peterson Institute, (author name: Chad P. Bown), calculated an average tariff rate for China of 47.6 percent, but the comparison with U.S. tariffs on other countries is unclear.
• The Council on Foreign Relations, (author name: Brad Setser), argued that the tariff differential between China and other countries is much smaller now than it was in 2024.
• The White House, (author name: Kush Desai), stated that Mr. Trump has pledged to end "America's foreign reliance by reviving domestic manufacturing and industry."
• The U.S.-China Business Council, (author name: Sean Stein), viewed the agreement as "a very strong step forward, giving some certainty and some predictability to what's happening in the U.S.-China relationship."
• (no date)
• (no date)
• The American Chamber of Commerce in Hanoi, (author name: Adam Sitkoff), stated that companies are unlikely to move out of Vietnam, India, and elsewhere to go back to China.