Trump's Nuclear Enigma: A Threat to International Arms Control

President Trump's recent statement suggesting the United States start testing nuclear weapons "on an equal basis" with Russia and China has left experts baffled. The country that has tested the most nuclear weapons, the US, has a choice to make: continue the status quo of a nuclear testing moratorium or potentially usher in a new era of nuclear testing, which could have disastrous consequences for the environment and global relations.

Key Takeaways:

  • The US has not tested a nuclear weapon since 1992, but has constructed new infrastructure for subcritical nuclear tests, which are underground experiments that test nuclear components without creating a nuclear chain reaction.
  • The US has more scientific knowledge about its nuclear weapons than Russia and China, which could give other countries an incentive to resume testing if the US were to do so.
  • A resumption of nuclear testing by the US could lead to a renewed arms race and increased tensions among nuclear-armed states.
  • The US, China, and Russia have all worked on construction projects at their respective testing grounds, although neither Moscow nor Beijing has confirmed the purpose of these projects.
  • The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, signed in 1996, prohibits underground nuclear testing, but the US and China failed to ratify it, and Russia rescinded its ratification in November 2023.
  • A new nuclear-powered cruise missile and underwater drone tested by Russia could be a reason for Mr. Trump's interest in testing nuclear capabilities.
  • The president has ordered the Energy Department to be ready to conduct a nuclear test with simplified processes, but this never occurred, and it's unclear what the current state of nuclear testing readiness is.

Statistics:

  • The US has tested more nuclear weapons than any other nation, with over 1,000 tests since 1945.
  • Russia has conducted 715 nuclear tests, and China 45.
  • It would take more than a year to prepare the diagnostic equipment, technical instrumentation, and infrastructure needed for a full-scale nuclear test in the US.
  • The cost of rebuilding the infrastructure in underground shafts as deep as 5,000 feet would be significant, but no specific figures are available.

Sources:

  • The New York Times, "At the Brink," a series on the prospect of nuclear testing.
  • The New York Times, "The United States, China and Russia have not conducted an underground nuclear test since signing the 1996 Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty."
  • The New York Times, "The US has not tested a nuclear weapon since 1992, but has constructed new infrastructure for subcritical nuclear tests."