Alberta Warns of $72-Billion Loss If Oil Pipeline Not Built
A report commissioned by the Alberta government predicts that oil sands producers could lose up to $72-billion if a pipeline is not built to ship heavy crude to the British Columbia coast. The report, conducted by consultants Wood Mackenzie, warns that without such a pipeline, oil sands companies would be unable to access growing Asian markets, particularly China. As a result, more bitumen would have to be shipped to U.S. refineries at a lower price, resulting in a significant loss of revenue.
Key Takeaways:
- The report estimates that oil sands producers could lose up to $72-billion if a pipeline is not built to ship heavy crude to the British Columbia coast.
- Without access to Asian markets, oil sands companies would be forced to ship more bitumen to U.S. refineries at a lower price.
- The report suggests that oil sands production could lead to a shortage of condensate, a toxic material used to thin heavy oil.
- Over 4,000 people have signed up to speak at the review panel hearings in two dozen communities in B.C. and Alberta.
- Alberta's Energy Department plans to present the report and make other submissions to the federal panel reviewing Enbridge Inc.'s proposed Northern Gateway project.
- Environmental groups, including ForestEthics, plan to submit their own reports questioning the project's economics.
Statistics:
- The report estimates that oil sands producers could lose $8-billion per year for 2017 to 2025 due to lack of access to Asian markets.
- The proposed Northern Gateway project would create two 1,170-kilometre-long pipelines from Bruderheim, Alta., to an oil tanker port to be built near Kitimat, B.C.
- The pipelines would be used to ship up to 525,000 barrels of oil sands bitumen per day and 193,000 barrels of light oily material daily.
- Over 4,000 people have registered to speak at the review panel hearings.
Sources:
- A report commissioned by the Alberta government, conducted by consultants Wood Mackenzie (exact date not specified)
- A report by ForestEthics (exact date not specified)
- The Canadian Press (exact date not specified)