Cities of Texas Intervene in Entergy Texas, Inc. Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery Factor Docket

The City of Anahuac, along with 21 other Texas municipalities, has filed a Motion to Intervene in the Public Utility Commission of Texas's docket regarding Entergy SS Texas, Inc.'s request to adjust its energy efficiency cost recovery factor. The cities argue that they have standing in the proceeding due to their justiciable interest in the application, as provided by the Public Utility Regulatory Act and the Texas Administrative Code.

Key Takeaways:

• The cities of Anahuac, Beaumont, Bridge City, and 18 others have filed a Motion to Intervene in the Entergy Texas, Inc. energy efficiency cost recovery factor docket.
• The cities cite their standing in the proceeding under the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA) § 33.025 and the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) § 22.103, as they have a justiciable interest that may be adversely affected by ETI's application.
• The cities' authorized representative is Daniel J. Lawton, and service of pleadings and documents should be directed to him or Molly Mayhall Vandervoort.
• The cities request that their Motion to Intervene be granted, along with all other relief to which they may show themselves to be justly entitled.

Statistics:

• 22 Texas municipalities have intervened in the Entergy Texas, Inc. energy efficiency cost recovery factor docket.
• The cities are represented by Daniel J. Lawton and Molly Mayhall Vandervoort.
• The cities claim a justiciable interest in the proceeding, citing PURA § 33.025 and TAC § 22.103.
• The motion was filed on May 16, 2025.

Sources:

• Public Utility Commission of Texas, "Application of Entergy SS Texas, Inc. To Adjust Its SS Energy Efficiency Cost SS Recovery Factor"
• 16 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) § 22.103
• 16 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) § 22.104
• Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA) § 33.025
• Certificate of Service, Mayhall Vandervoort, May 16, 2025.