Sign in Subscribe
Banks (Finance)

Court Screening Order: Plaintiff's Claims of Disability Discrimination against JP Morgan Chase Bank

Strategic Insights

— 1 min read

The Northern District of California Court has issued a screening order in the case of Odin Nordheim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, highlighting serious allegations of disability discrimination and financial-disclosure violations against the bank. According to the plaintiff, JP Morgan Chase Bank closed his account without notice, questioned him publicly, and refused to reopen it, resulting in him being unable to access banking services. The plaintiff also claims that other banks have rejected his attempts to open accounts due to Chase sharing his information with them.

Key Takeaways:

  • The plaintiff, Odin Nordheim, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, suing JP Morgan Chase Bank for alleged disability discrimination and financial-disclosure violations.
  • The plaintiff claims Chase humiliated him by questioning him publicly, made him feel unsafe, and closed his account without notice, resulting in him being unable to access banking services.
  • Chase's actions have led to the plaintiff being rejected by other banks, possibly due to Chase sharing his information with them.
  • The plaintiff alleges that his inability to access the financial system has left him vulnerable to further hardship and risk.
  • The plaintiff identifies multiple laws protecting his rights, including 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Graham-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), and the Unruh Act.
  • The plaintiff asks for $10 million in damages, litigation costs, an apology, and an injunction against further discrimination or blacklisting.

Statistics:

  • The plaintiff's account balance when Chase closed it was $77.56.
  • The plaintiff has been unable to access banking services since Chase closed his account.
  • The plaintiff has attempted to open accounts with other banks but has been rejected, possibly due to Chase sharing his financial information with them.
  • The plaintiff is seeking a total of $10 million in damages and other relief.

Sources:

  • 42 U.S.C. § 1981
  • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.)
  • Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) (15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.)
  • Graham-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) (15 U.S.C. § 6801 et seq.)
  • California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL) (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200)
  • Unruh Act (Cal. Civ. Code § 51)
  • United States Constitution (Fourteenth Amendment)
  • 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
  • Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S. 365 (1978)
  • Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386 (1987)

Read more