Genocide in Rwanda: A Global Response Crisis

The world is witnessing a humanitarian disaster in Rwanda, with thousands killed and many more trapped in the capital city of Kigali. The New York Times editorial board comments that what appears to be genocide is taking place, with innocent people being brutally murdered based on their ethnic identity. The United Nations Security Council has responded by reducing the number of peacekeepers from 1,700 to 270, leaving thousands of Rwandans in dire circumstances. The international community is grappling with the moral and ethical implications of its inaction.

Key Takeaways:

  • The situation in Rwanda is described as a potential genocide, with thousands of bodies already piled up and the killing continuing despite the presence of UN peacekeepers.
  • The UN Security Council reduced the number of peacekeepers from 1,700 to 270, reflecting the unwillingness of most UN member states to commit to a larger force to stop the conflict.
  • Approximately 12,000 Rwandans sought sanctuary in Kigali, with 10,000 in the national stadium and 2,000 in a Kigali hospital, leaving them vulnerable to slaughter.
  • The US was not a major contributor to the original 2,500-troop force, and its diplomats voted to reduce the UN presence in Rwanda, arguing that keeping a small force was better than nothing.
  • The crisis highlights the need for a mobile, quick-response force under UN aegis to deal with such humanitarian catastrophes, as the world has limited options in responding effectively to internal conflicts.
  • Human rights groups have condemned the abandonment of innocent Rwandans, emphasizing the moral and ethical implications of the international community's actions.

Statistics:

  • 1,700 UN peacekeepers were initially deployed in Rwanda.
  • The number of peacekeepers was reduced to 270 by the UN Security Council.
  • Approximately 5,000 Rwandans were killed near the national stadium.
  • 5,000 people were taking refuge in the Kigali hospital.
  • 300 people were said to be in a hotel.
  • 20-odd countries contributed troops to the original 2,500-troop force.
  • Three countries (Belgium, Bangladesh, and Ghana) have already recalled their contingents.

Sources:

  • The New York Times, Editorial Board (April 23, 1994)