Sign in Subscribe
Human rights

International Court of Justice Ruling on Climate Change Ignites Alarm Bells

Strategic Insights

— 1 min read

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has issued a landmark ruling on the legal duties of states to respond to climate change, deeming inaction a human rights violation and an infringement of international law. This far-reaching decision has significant implications for nations and activists, opening the door to climate reparations lawsuits. The ruling is technically advisory and nonbinding but carries considerable weight in international and national courts.

Key Takeaways:

  • The ICJ ruling demands "deep, rapid, and sustained reductions" in emissions and warns that failure to act may constitute an internationally wrongful act.
  • The judgment will "redefine the legal landscape of global climate governance," according to Simmons & Simmons, a leading international law firm.
  • Last month, climate lawsuits worldwide reached 3,099, up from 2,550 two years earlier, with recent findings including a European Court of Human Rights ruling that forced Switzerland to adopt harsher climate policies.
  • Climate activists expect many more lawsuits to follow, including suits against fossil fuel firms and U.S. companies operating in Europe.
  • The ICJ's ruling has been criticized for not getting the science right, misreading the Paris agreement, and downgrading humanity's many other needs outside of climate concerns.
  • The ruling has been described as "myopic" by Bjorn Lomborg, president of the Copenhagen Consensus Center, who argues that strong climate policies are among the least efficient ways to improve human welfare.

Statistics:

  • 3,099 climate lawsuits worldwide as of last month (up from 2,550 two years earlier)
  • 80% of global biomass represented by plant life experiences a carbon dioxide-fueled global greening
  • Global coal consumption in China has increased 19-fold over the past 60 years
  • U.N. climate panel scenarios show that fossil fuels are likely to continue to improve life (even with climate change) and deliver greater human opportunity in the 21st century

Sources:

  • Bjorn Lomborg, president of the Copenhagen Consensus Center, and author of "Best Things First."
  • Simmons & Simmons, a leading international law firm.
  • The International Court of Justice (ICJ)
  • The European Court of Human Rights
  • The United Nations (U.N.) climate panel.

Read more