Lotus vs. Borland: "Look and Feel" Judgment Overturned on Appeal
The Court of Appeal for the First Circuit has reversed the lower court's decision, declaring that Borland International did not infringe on Lotus Development's copyright for its 1-2-3 spreadsheet menu command hierarchy. This ruling marks a significant victory for Borland and sets a precedent for the software industry, as it aligns with the US Supreme Court's recent rejection of Apple's "look and feel" suit against Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard over the Windows interface.
Key Takeaways:
- The Court of Appeal ruled that the Lotus menu command hierarchy is uncopyrightable subject matter, and therefore Borland did not infringe on the copyright by copying it.
- The three judges compared the menu commands to buttons used to control a video cassette recorder, determining that they are functional and not protected by copyright.
- Borland had provided compatible commands as an option in its Quattro Pro spreadsheet to help users switching from 1-2-3, and had removed infringing features after court decisions went against it.
- The decision is a huge relief for Borland, which was facing damages of more than $100m, but disclosed in court that its available cash could fall as low as $47m this summer.
- Borland sold Quattro Pro to Novell, which offers the program as part of the WordPerfect Office suite.
- The ruling reinforces the US Supreme Court's recent decision and promotes innovation and competition in the software industry.
Statistics:
- The Court of Appeal ruled in favor of Borland, declaring that the Lotus menu command hierarchy is uncopyrightable subject matter.
- Borland was seeking damages of more than $100m, but the company disclosed in court that its available cash could fall as low as $47m this summer.
- The ruling sets a precedent for the software industry, aligning with the US Supreme Court's recent rejection of Apple's "look and feel" suit against Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard.
Sources:
- Jack Schofield, Lotus Development has had its 'look and feel' victory over Borland International overturned on appeal. (Undated)