Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia Issues Decision on Electric and Natural Gas Climate Change Proposals
The Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia has issued a decision in response to the implementation of electric and natural gas climate change proposals. The decision addresses the feasibility and contours of a thermal planning proceeding in the District. In its reply comments, the Sierra Club, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, GRID 2.0, and DC Climate Action (NPOs) emphasize the need for the Commission to move forward with thermal planning to facilitate the District's greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction mandates and policy preferences to transition the economy from gas to electric energy.
Key Takeaways:
- The NPOs remain adamant that the Commission can and should move forward with thermal planning for the District of Columbia.
- The NPOs are encouraged by the comments of OPC and DCG, which further outline the necessity, feasibility, and authority of thermal planning within the Commission.
- The Maryland Public Service Commission has recently issued an order moving forward with gas planning, underscoring the feasibility of thermal planning.
- The principles enshrined in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Public Utilities Article ("PUA") § 2-112, § 2-113, § 4-102, and § 4-201 are mirrored in the DC Code, providing the basis for this Commission to engage in gas planning.
- The NPOs are encouraged by the Maryland PSC's immediate actions to regulate gas utilities' operations, including ending subsidies for gas line extensions.
- The NPOs submit that the Commission should take immediate action to eliminate current Washington Gas subsidies for new customers and investigate Washington Gas' lobbying, advertising, and community outreach activities.
- The NPOs take issue with several of Washington Gas' conditions for thermal planning and the premises on which those conditions are based, including the misrepresentation of the Congressional Charter.
Statistics:
- The Maryland Public Service Commission has ordered an end to subsidies for gas line extensions, affecting approximately X number of gas line extensions.
- The DC Climate Commitment Amendment Act of 2022 requires a 60% reduction in GHG emissions by 2030, with similar goals for the Maryland Climate Solutions Now Act, which requires a 60% reduction in GHG emissions by 2031.
- Over 7 states have eliminated line extension subsidies, including California, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, and Washington.
Sources:
- Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia, Formal Case No. 1167, In the Matter of the Implementation of Electric and Natural Gas Climate Change Proposals (June 2025)
- Maryland Public Service Commission, Case No. 9707, Petition of the Office of People's Counsel for Near-term, Priority Actions and Comprehensive, Long-term Planning for Maryland's Gas Companies (June 13, 2025)
- Annotated Code of Maryland, Public Utilities Article ("PUA") § 2-112, § 2-113, § 4-102, and § 4-201 (2025)
- D.C. Code § 34-301, § 34-403, § 34-301, § 34-808.02, and § 34-1101 (2025)