Renewable Energy vs. Non-Renewable Energy: Critical Impact on Environmental Sustainability in the BRICS Region

Investigators at the University of the Witwatersrand have conducted research to examine the impact of renewable and non-renewable energy sources on environmental sustainability in the BRICS region. The findings revealed that non-renewable energy sources, particularly coal and natural gas, contribute to higher levels of carbon dioxide emissions, whereas renewable energy sources such as hydro, wind, and solar energy lessen this burden. The study cautions against the heavy reliance on non-renewable energy sources, as they threaten livelihoods and biodiversity.

Key Takeaways:

• The study focused on the BRICS region, which includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, to examine the impact of renewable and non-renewable energy sources on environmental sustainability.
• Non-renewable energy sources, such as coal and natural gas, were found to increase carbon dioxide emissions in both the short and long term.
• Renewable energy sources, including hydro, wind, and solar energy, were found to decrease carbon dioxide emissions and promote environmental sustainability.
• The study recommends a balanced approach to energy production and consumption, prioritizing renewable energy sources to ensure the livelihoods and biodiversity of future generations.
• The role of policymakers in striking a balance between meeting energy demands and protecting the environment is highlighted.
• The findings of the study have significant implications for the global energy landscape and the transition to a low-carbon economy.

The research was conducted by Baneng Naape and published in the journal Environmental Energy and Economic Research, 2024,8(3).