Sign in Subscribe
Air pollution

Research Reveals Key Insights into Global Warming and Climate Change Mitigation

Strategic Insights

— 2 min read

A global effort is underway to reduce greenhouse gas net emissions (GHGNE), with agriculture and forestry being considered as means to supply emissions offsets due to their contribution to nearly 20% of global emissions. However, the issue of comparative offset costs has become important, as other sources of emissions also present opportunities for reducing GHGNE. Research conducted by Texas A&M University has examined the offset costs associated with reducing net carbon dioxide equivalent emissions in agriculture and highlighted the relative costs and associated cost components.

Key Takeaways:

  • The research aims to identify low-cost means of net emission offsets for economic well-being, highlighting the importance of agriculture and forestry as sources of emissions offsets.
  • Agriculture and forestry contribute nearly 20% of global emissions, making them a significant area for reducing GHGNE.
  • The study compares the offset costs associated with reducing net carbon dioxide equivalent emissions in agriculture and highlights the relative costs and associated cost components.
  • The research concludes that differences in claimable versus saleable GHGNE quantities and market transaction costs explain the large variation in observed prices paid for different emission offset actions.
  • Case studies are conducted to estimate the gap in GHGNE costs for different situations.
  • The study illustrates the potential for a carbon market to bridge the gap between buyers and sellers.
  • The research aims to provide a framework for estimating the per-tonne GHGNE cost and formulating expressions for the cost to buyers, payments to sellers, and the gap in between.

Statistics:

  • Agriculture and forestry contribute nearly 20% of global emissions (Source: Texas A&M University).
  • The study examines the offset costs associated with reducing net carbon dioxide equivalent emissions in agriculture (Source: Texas A&M University).
  • The research concludes that differences in claimable versus saleable GHGNE quantities and market transaction costs explain the large variation in observed prices paid for different emission offset actions (Source: The Price Gap In Agriculture-based Greenhouse Gas Offset Markets).
  • Case studies are conducted to estimate the gap in GHGNE costs for different situations (Source: The Price Gap In Agriculture-based Greenhouse Gas Offset Markets).
  • The study illustrates the potential for a carbon market to bridge the gap between buyers and sellers (Source: The Price Gap In Agriculture-based Greenhouse Gas Offset Markets).

Sources:

  • The Price Gap In Agriculture-based Greenhouse Gas Offset Markets. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2025. (Wiley-Blackwell - www.wiley.com/; Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics - onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8489)
  • Texas A&M University, Department of Agricultural Economics, College Station, TX 77840, United States (Chengcheng J. Fei, Jingyi W. Liu, and Bruce A. McCarl)

Read more