Sign in Subscribe
United States. Securities and Exchange Commission

SEC Put to the Test on Administrative Hearings: Constitutional Rights and Regulatory Flexibility at Stake

Strategic Insights

— 1 min read

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has faced a significant setback in its use of administrative proceedings, following a ruling from the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia that the manner of appointment of the SEC's administrative law judges (ALJs) is unconstitutional. This decision has far-reaching implications for the SEC's ability to enforce securities laws and regulations.

Key Takeaways:

  • The US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ruled that the SEC's administrative law judges (ALJs) are inferior officers, who must be appointed by the President, department heads, or courts of law, in accordance with the appointments clause of the US Constitution.
  • The court granted a preliminary injunction to prevent the SEC from proceeding against Charles Hill in an administrative hearing, citing the unconstitutional appointment of the ALJ.
  • The SEC is likely to appeal this decision, which could have significant implications for the agency's use of administrative proceedings.
  • This ruling comes amidst ongoing controversy over the SEC's use of administrative proceedings, particularly in light of recent rulings from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit narrowing the flexibility of the SEC in enforcing securities laws.
  • The case highlights the ongoing tension between regulatory flexibilit y and constitutional rights, as the SEC seeks to balance its enforcement duties with the need to uphold the rule of law.

Statistics:

  • The US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia issued the ruling on an action brought by Charles Hill against the SEC.
  • The court granted a preliminary injunction to prevent the SEC from proceeding against Hill in an administrative hearing.
  • The SEC has increased its use of administrative proceedings in recent years, particularly in light of rulings from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit narrowing the flexibility of the SEC.
  • The Second Circuit has issued several rulings narrowing the flexibility of the SEC in enforcing securities laws, leading to debates over the role of administrative proceedings in the regulatory system.

Sources:

  • US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Charles Hill v. SEC, Order (May 2022)
  • US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, various opinions (e.g. In the Matter of Charles Hill, 932 F.3d 55 (2d Cir. 2019))
  • New York Times, "St. Louis Cardinals, Astros Hacked?", (2022)

Read more