Sign in Subscribe
Emigration and immigration

The Blurred Lines of Immigration Law: Character Assessments, Discretion, and the Quest for Fairness

Strategic Insights

— 2 min read

South Africa's immigration law is marked by inconsistencies and arbitrary decisions, with the Department of Home Affairs (DHA) frequently applying "character" assessments across all categories, including those where no such requirement exists, as a blanket ground for rejection. The case of Julius Malema's UK visa denial serves as a cautionary tale on the grounds of "undesirability" stemming from his repeated public chanting of violent rhetoric. The malevolent character of immigration decision-making is further underscored by the DHA's habitual reliance on discretion, leading to substantively and procedurally unlawful rejections. This opaque system penalises full disclosure and rewards quiet entry, resulting in a fragmented system that perpetuates ethical inconsistency.

Key Takeaways:

  • The South African government's approach to immigration has been marred by inconsistencies and arbitrary decisions, particularly in the application of the "good and sound character" requirement.
  • The Department of Home Affairs frequently misapplies the "character" assessment, using it as a blanket ground for rejection across various categories.
  • The UK's refusal to grant Julius Malema a visa serves as a warning about the increasing trend of excluding individuals based on conceptions of social order, morality, or good standing, rather than solely on criminal convictions.
  • Immigration enforcement in the US has become more digitized, with the use of social media content, online associations, and digital footprints playing a significant role in determining eligibility.
  • The South African immigration regime must adhere to the principles of transformative justice to uphold the constitutional values of dignity and fairness.
  • The training and education of immigration officials are crucial in ensuring the fair and just application of immigration laws.

Statistics:

  • As of 2023, South Africa requires police clearance certificates only from countries where the applicant has resided for 12 months or more during the five years preceding the application.
  • Section 29 of the Immigration Act lists "prohibited persons" who are automatically barred from entry into South Africa, including those convicted of serious offences.
  • In 2025, the US deported based on allegations of gang or terrorist affiliations, even without convictions.
  • The US has increasingly used digital surveillance, including the search of travellers' personal devices and questioning based on online associations or social media content.

Sources:

  • The World Crunch News
  • "The Panelgip in Immigration Law" by , DEMMJ 2024, Volume: 1 Issue: 1
  • "Crime, Immigration and character assessment: does stereotyping tell new story?" by Evered, R.M 2011, BUIMUS, 2011 (47) 41-51
  • "Immigration Enforcement and Social Media" by Chhabria, et al. , 2022, The University of Chicago Law Review
  • "Julius Malema: US travel ban is an affront to SA constitution" by Mjobo 2024, Sunday Times

Read more