Uncertainty Surrounds Pakistan's Military and Foreign Policy Control

The control of Pakistan's military and foreign policy remains unclear, with some attributing it to Islamabad and others arguing that the military has taken over strategic decision-making. The Washington Post op-ed by Ahmed Rashid highlights the concerns surrounding this issue, particularly given Pakistan's history of military-backed governments and the nuclear capability of its military. Representative Ike Skelton asked the witnesses about the trend of control between the military and civilian government in this regard.

Key Takeaways:

• Lieutenant General John Paxton Jr. testified that Pakistan is working towards civilian control of the military, with a respect for the obligations and responsibilities on both sides.
• General Paxton stated that General Kayani is mindful of controlling the nuclear stockpile and is responsive to President Zardari and Prime Minister Gilani's direction.
• The current trend in Pakistan's government is a democracy that has been out of practice for some years, with a shift towards civilian control.
• The military's past involvement in strategic decision-making has left concerns about its current level of control over foreign policy.
• Ahmed Rashid's op-ed raised questions about the military's control over Pakistan's foreign policy and decision-making.

Statistics:

• Pakistan has been a democracy for several decades, although it has had periods of military rule.
• The country has a nuclear stockpile and is considered a key player in regional security.
• The current government is led by President Zardari and Prime Minister Gilani.
• The military has historically played a significant role in Pakistan's government and foreign policy.

Sources:

• Washington Post op-ed by Ahmed Rashid (Tuesday, 2010)
• House Armed Services Committee Hearing (Thursday, April 29, 2010)
• Federal News Service, Inc. (transcript)