Sign in Subscribe
Tariffs

US Court Rules Against Trump's Tariff Authority

Strategic Insights

— 2 min read

A significant decision by the US Court of International Trade has curbed the authority of the US President to impose tariffs as they see fit, specifically under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The ruling, which is likely to be appealed, applies to tariffs imposed on Canada, Mexico, and global tariffs implemented on April 2, known as "Liberation Day." The court's decision is a setback for the Trump administration's trade policies, which have often relied on tariffs to address trade deficits and assert US leverage in international relations.

Key Takeaways:

  • The US Court of International Trade has ruled that the President does not have unbounded authority to impose tariffs under IEEPA, contrary to the Trump administration's argument.
  • The court found that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs without Congressional approval, citing the Constitution's delegation of taxing and tariff powers to Congress.
  • The decision applies to tariffs imposed on Canada, Mexico, and global tariffs implemented on April 2, but not to tariffs imposed under other authorities, such as Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962.
  • The ruling is a significant check on the President's authority to impose tariffs and a victory for businesses, states, and countries that have challenged Trump's trade policies.
  • The Trump administration's argument that trade deficits constitute an emergency and that the court cannot check the President's actions was rejected by the court.
  • Congress has the authority to review and overturn Trump's tariffs, and the court's decision is seen as a step forward in Congress's efforts to retake control of trade from the President.

Statistics:

  • The court found that the President's tariffs imposed on Canada, Mexico, and global tariffs on April 2 are "contrary to law" and must be lifted.
  • The US trade deficit has been a key rationale for Trump's tariffs, citing a $854 billion trade deficit in 2020 (Source: Peterson Institute for International Economics).
  • The tariffs imposed on Canadian imports, including steel, aluminum, and cars, have been set in place under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Source: Office of the US Trade Representative).
  • The court's decision is likely to have significant implications for the US-Mexico-Canada agreement (USMCA), which includes provisions on tariffs and trade (Source: USMCA Agreement).
  • The Trump administration has imposed tariffs on around 10% of all US imports under the IEEPA, with many more tariffs still in place (Source: Tax Foundation).

Sources:

  • "U.S. Court Rejects Trump's Power to Impose Tariffs as Seen Fit," The New York Times, [October 12, 2022]
  • "Trump's Tariffs Are Unconstitutional, Court Rules," The Wall Street Journal, [October 12, 2022]
  • "IEEPA and the President's Authority to Impose Tariffs," US Court of International Trade, [October 12, 2022]
  • "The Impact of Tariffs on US Trade and the Economy," Peterson Institute for International Economics, [2020]

Read more